My Case Study in Controversial Apple Business Practices
-
Case Studies in Controversial Apple Business PracticesPrepared by: Sonny Gibson (s0nt3k)
Introduction
It’s no secret that I’m not a fan of Apple. After working on enough of their devices over the years, I’ve come to the conclusion that I will never own one myself. If I were an Apple supporter, this list would be much, much longer because then I’d have the interest (and patience) to catalog every detail.
The cases mentioned in this paper are simply the ones I know about firsthand or have encountered often enough to understand their impact. If you’re aware of other examples, I encourage you to comment and share them because the bigger the picture, the clearer the pattern becomes.
Case Study 1: iPhone 4 Antenna Failure (“Antennagate”)
Issue:
The iPhone 4’s antenna design lost signal when held in a normal way.Apple’s Response:
Apple first told customers they were “holding it wrong.” They later offered bumper cases.Consumer Impact:
- Calls dropped during normal use.
- Customers had to pay for a case to compensate for Apple’s flawed design.
Ethical Concern:
Shifting responsibility to the customer instead of acknowledging design fault.
Case Study 2: MacBook Pro i9 Thermal Throttling
Issue:
The 2018 Intel i9 MacBook Pro overheated under normal workloads. Poor thermal design forced the CPU to throttle.
Apple’s Response:
A firmware update slowed the CPU, making performance worse than cheaper i7 models.
Consumer Impact:
- Customers paid premium prices for downgraded performance.
- Damaged Apple’s reputation with professional users.
Ethical Concern:
Selling hardware that cannot perform as advertised.
Case Study 3: $5 Inverter Chip Repair Block
Issue:
A small $5 inverter chip failed from overheating in some MacBooks.
Apple’s Response:
Apple reportedly secured exclusive rights to the chip supply, blocking outside sales.Consumer Impact:
- Customers forced into $400–$1000 repairs or full device replacements.
- Reduced availability of affordable, independent repairs.
Ethical Concern:
Anti-competitive practice against independent repair markets.
Case Study 4: Battery Throttling (“Batterygate”)
Issue:
Apple secretly throttled iPhone performance as batteries aged, without disclosure.
Apple’s Response:
Admitted after backlash. Offered discounted $29 battery replacements.
Consumer Impact:
- Devices felt obsolete, pushing customers toward upgrades.
- Massive consumer distrust.
Penalty:
Apple paid hundreds of millions in global settlements (e.g., $500M in U.S. class actions).
Ethical Concern:
Lack of transparency and deceptive product management.
Case Study 5: Liquid Contact Indicators (LCIs / “Red Stickers”)
Issue:
Humidity (e.g., coastal regions) could trigger moisture sensors, even without liquid exposure.
Apple’s Response:
LCIs were treated as definitive proof of water damage, voiding warranties.
Consumer Impact:
- Thousands of denied warranty claims.
- Out-of-pocket costs for covered issues.
Penalty:
Apple settled a $53 million U.S. class action lawsuit in 2013.
Ethical Concern:
Misuse of diagnostic tools to shift liability away from Apple.
Case Study 6: Right-to-Repair Restrictions
Issue:
Apple consistently restricts repair through:
- Proprietary screws and adhesives
- “Parts pairing” that disables features if not repaired by Apple
- Blocking manuals and diagnostic tools
Consumer Impact:
- Higher repair costs
- Independent repair shops excluded
- Increased e-waste
Status:
Facing new legislation in the U.S. and EU to allow fair repair.
Ethical Concern:
Deliberately reducing consumer freedom and increasing waste.
Case Study 7: Overpriced Accessories & Forced Adapters
Issue:
- Headphone jack removal forced purchase of dongles.
- Chargers removed from iPhone boxes (marketed as environmental), but sold separately.
Consumer Impact:
- Customers pay more for basic functionality.
Ethical Concern:
Using green marketing to justify profit-driven decisions.
Case Study 8: MacBook Butterfly Keyboard Failures
Issue:
Butterfly keyboard switches jammed easily from dust or debris.
Apple’s Response:
Persisted with design for years before lawsuits forced change.Consumer Impact:
- Multiple failures per device
- High downtime for repairs
Penalty:
Apple paid $50 million in U.S. settlements.
Ethical Concern:
Prioritizing thinness over reliability.
Case Study 9: Planned Obsolescence Allegations
Issue:
Older Apple devices lose updates earlier than necessary, or receive updates that slow them down.
Consumer Impact:
- Devices feel prematurely outdated.
- Increased upgrade cycle and e-waste.
Ethical Concern:
Encouraging unnecessary consumption.
Case Study 10: Component Supply Lockouts
Issue:
Apple has secured exclusive contracts for components like NAND chips and ICs.
Consumer Impact:
- Restricted independent repair options
- Inflated costs for replacements
Ethical Concern:
Anti-competitive supply chain practices.
Case Study 11: Soldered RAM & SSDs (No Upgrades Allowed)
Issue:
Apple moved to soldered RAM and SSDs, eliminating user upgrades.
Consumer Impact:
- $200–$1000+ Apple markups for upgrades
- Smaller SSDs wear out faster due to limited write cycles
- If RAM/SSD fails, the whole logic board must be replaced
Ethical Concern:
Removing consumer choice and forcing early device replacements.
Case Study 12: Fragile Hinges (Flexgate & Hinge Failures)
Issue:
- 2016–2017 MacBook Pros suffered “Flexgate” failures: display cables were too short, breaking after repeated lid use.
- Earlier MacBooks also used cheap hinges that cracked under normal wear.
Apple’s Response:
Acknowledged some defects but limited repair programs.
Consumer Impact:
- Display failures required $400–$700 repairs
- Many customers left without coverage
Ethical Concern:
Cost-cutting design leading to premature failure and expensive repairs.
Key Takeaways- Pattern of Behavior: Apple introduces sleek designs that sacrifice repairability and durability.
- Profit Over Transparency: Apple often denies flaws, shifts blame, or sells overpriced fixes.
- Consumer Consequences:
- Higher repair and upgrade costs
- Devices fail earlier than necessary
- Reduced repair freedom, increased e-waste
- Legal & Ethical Pressure: Apple has paid out hundreds of millions in settlements and faces growing regulation.
